Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates:
Featured picture candidates Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for Featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal thingsNominatingGuidelines for nominatorsPlease read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documentsThere are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." PhotographsOn the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audioPlease nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. Set nominationsIf a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Simple tutorial for new usersAdding a new nominationIf you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate image description and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters. VotingEditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidatesOver time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policyGeneral rules
Featuring and delisting rulesA candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Above all, be politePlease don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken. See also
|
Table of contents
Featured picture candidates
Voting period ends on 19 Oct 2024 at 07:35:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
- Info Theyyam is a ritual art form of Kerala.
All by Shagil Kannur -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 07:35, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 07:35, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Oct 2024 at 21:50:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Settlements#Morocco
- Info created by Mounir Neddi - uploaded by Mounir Neddi - nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 21:50, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 21:50, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Oct 2024 at 21:18:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures_outdoors
- Info created by ReneeWrites - uploaded by ReneeWrites - nominated by User:ReneeWrites -- ReneeWrites (talk) 21:18, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ReneeWrites (talk) 21:18, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well framed; huge resolution and detail. Cmao20 (talk) 21:21, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Oct 2024 at 20:49:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Spain
- Info created and uploaded by SecondNews - cropped by El Comandante - edited and nominated by ★ -- ★ 20:49, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support I'm back in the area! 😉 It's rare to see: the Sagrada Família without the cranes 🏗️. BTW, the temple is probably the most important and interesting building in Spain. I like the textures of the towers. Enjoy the view! -- ★ 20:49, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Small photo, visibly unsharp, noise in the sky. Definitely not the most important building in Spain either. Cmao20 (talk) 21:11, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Really not? I'm not Spanish, but I always see the church in the country's tourism reviews and I read that the church has been under construction since 1882. I can be wrong, but I'm particularly curious to know when and how it will be finished. And I can't see the noise in the sky. ★ 21:25, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral A almost 30 years old camera shoot that look today like a smartphone photo. --Wilfredor (talk) 01:57, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- What's the shutter capacity of the Nikon D3? ★ 02:04, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- I don't even know what 'shutter capacity' means in this context. Cmao20 (talk) 04:14, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Something went very wrong here. --Mile (talk) 09:30, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Oct 2024 at 17:40:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Italy
- Info Inside the Sforzesco Castle, in Milan, it is possible to visit the Dukes' Courtyard (Arch. Benedetto Ferrini, 1473), the heart of the life of the Sforza court, which with the swimming pool in the garden, the frescoed portico and the decorations, convey the sumptuous and elegant lifestyle of the Milan dukes. Here it is impossible not to be enchanted and expect to have a souvenir photo for yourself... Created - uploaded - nominated by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 17:40, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 17:40, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support I wish it was a bit sharper, but regardless, stunning composition and beautiful place. Cmao20 (talk) 21:10, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 22:23, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Oct 2024 at 17:23:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Hymenoptera#Family : Apidae (Bumble Bees, Honey Bees, Carpenter Bees, Cuckoo Bees, Orchid Bees, and Stingless Bees)
- Info A red-tailed bumblebee or bombus lapidarius, a female worker, collecting nectar and pollen on chives. On its rear legs you can see pollen baskets (or “corbicula”), where it stashes loads of pollen to carry back to the nest. The picture was taken in a garden in the southern part of the Stockholm Municipality, Sweden, by Lake Mälaren, the third-largest freshwater lake in Sweden (after Vänern and Vättern). Created by Simiha - uploaded by Simiha - nominated by Simiha -- Simiha (talk) 17:23, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Simiha (talk) 17:23, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry. It's cool to get a bumblebee this close and I think this is a useful image but I don't think the sharpness and depth of field match the best we have in the FP galleries. Cmao20 (talk) 21:08, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Lacks image quality, and not the best view of the bee --Uoaei1 (talk) 05:51, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Oct 2024 at 13:40:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Italy
- Info Summit cross of the Schneespitze in the Stubai Alps and view into the Pflersch valley. In the background the Zillertal Alps. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 13:40, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Milseburg (talk) 13:40, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The orange object at the bottom spoils the overall great image and should be removed.--Ermell (talk) 13:51, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the hint. I cleaned up the summit area. Milseburg (talk) 17:53, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Lovely composition and excellent image quality Cmao20 (talk) 21:07, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Perfect! --Uoaei1 (talk) 05:53, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support well done --Terragio67 (talk) 07:33, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 07:49, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
Morning view of the pond at Oizumi Ryokuchi Park - Set
Voting period ends on 18 Oct 2024 at 07:04:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page
-
Twilight view of the pond at Oizumi Ryokuchi Park
-
Sunrise view of the pond at Oizumi Ryokuchi Park
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Japan
- Info Twilight view and sunrise view of the pond at Oizumi Ryokuchi Park. Set nomination. c/u/n by Laitche -- Laitche (talk) 07:04, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Laitche (talk) 07:04, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support I supported these before and I still think they are beautiful. I'm not sure it was wise to withdraw them and renominate as a set without any actual change to the content of the images, and I don't think we should make a habit of that. But I do think these look more impress as a duo and may be likelier to pass that way. Sensitive light and mood. Cmao20 (talk) 11:30, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good idea! JukoFF (talk) 18:59, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful set. ★ 22:24, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The power line is very present in this scenery and ruins it for me, sorry --Uoaei1 (talk) 05:59, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose This was exactly my feedback before Poco a poco (talk) 09:50, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2024 at 22:08:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Moldova
- Info Saharna Monastery, Saharna, Moldova. It's considered one of the biggest centres for religious pilgrimages in Moldova. The legend says that a monk from the monastery once saw the shining figure of Saint Maria on the top of a rock. When reaching that spot the monk saw a mark of a footstep on the ground. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 22:08, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 22:08, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support This was on my list to nominate Cmao20 (talk) 22:18, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 22:23, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive room with abundant, but harmonious decoration; excellent photo. – Aristeas (talk) 10:10, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 13:52, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 15:40, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support South Sudan, Moldova… what's the next country? ★ 23:38, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- To be more precise: after South Sudan I visited Uganda, Ethiopia, Tanzania (including Zanzibar), Kenia, Oman, Kuwait and Bahrain (not mentioning 4-5 countries in Europe) :). I just came back from Turkey, next target is Baja California. Brazil still has to wait :( Poco a poco (talk) 09:45, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2024 at 22:03:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Spain
- Info RetroChoir of the cathedral of Segovia, Spain. The temple was built in the Flamboyant style and was dedicated in 1768, constituting one of the latest Gothic cathedrals in Europe. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 22:03, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 22:03, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Love the ray of sunlight Cmao20 (talk) 22:17, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 22:24, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 22:32, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wonderful depiction of that famous cathedral, giving an impressive feeling of the size and height of these sacred halls, and the sunray is the the icing on the cake. – Aristeas (talk) 10:06, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 13:53, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral There is a noticeable chromatic aberration in the rays of light, specifically one green and one purple. There's a general overexposure resulting in overly bright windows; although this is common in non-HDR shots, I believe it has been slightly overdone in this case. An aperture of F/11 doesn't seem to be sufficient, as the foreground, especially at the edges, appears sharp, but the more distant areas of the rear ceiling lack sharpness and are overexposed. The Corpus Christi looks flat, possibly due to light pollution. In summary, the issue could be mitigated by lowering the exposure and correcting the chromatic aberration, especially in the central purple ray. Regarding the lack of focus at the end due to the shallow depth of field, I consider it acceptable. (See notes) --Wilfredor (talk) 15:01, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 05:54, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2024 at 21:14:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/People#Groups
- Info Albert Edelfelt: The Luxembourg Gardens, Paris (1887) - uploaded by Susannaanas - nominated by --Thi (talk) 21:14, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Thi (talk) 21:14, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 21:25, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:50, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 08:04, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent reproduction of a notable painting. The painting itself stands out for me among similar Paris paintings from that era because it concentrates on the activities of the children and of their nannies. – Aristeas (talk) 09:58, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support High resolution and good quality. Surprising composition with people cropped on both sides, almost like a photograph -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:41, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support per above... stunning. -- Terragio67 (talk) 18:28, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 23:39, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 01:59, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
Schlosskirche
Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2024 at 20:46:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page
-
Looking east towards the altar
-
Looking west towards the organ
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Germany
- Info A long time ago (some years now) I left DXR a note on his talk page pointing out a stitching error in the first of these two pictures, and he kindly corrected it for me. Looking at the picture again now, I think it is interesting enough to be worthy of FP, together with its companion piece, the view of this church's nave in the opposite direction. The Schlosskirche, or literally castle church, is a German baroque building constructed in the mid eighteenth century and adjoining the castle/palace of the town of Bad Mergentheim, where the Teutonic Knights once had their base. It is a notable landmark and I think these pictures give a good impression of the interior, including the beautiful ceiling frescoes (which you can see even more clearly in this picture which is IMO FP in its own right but may not fit into the scope of this set). created by DXR - uploaded by DXR - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 20:46, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 20:46, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent quality and detail, perfect depiction of the place and aesthetically pleasing. – Aristeas (talk) 09:54, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 05:55, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2024 at 19:36:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1940-1949
- Info All by Kritzolina. Wikimania 2024 made it possible for me to visit the KZs in Auschwitz for the first time. I did not plan to take pictures, but some happened. This one feels like it could work to show some of my feelings there. I am not sure about the gallery for this image. Please feel free to change the gallery to a more fitting one, if you have a clear idea of wher to put it. -- Kritzolina (talk) 19:36, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Kritzolina (talk) 19:36, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Effective composition that highlights the horrible nature of this place Cmao20 (talk) 20:50, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Doesn't work for me. Does not stand out from ordinary images.--Thi (talk) 21:03, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support In my opinion, the documentary value of this shot is just as high as its artistic value. It is not a whitewashed treatment, but conveys the horror that lies in the imagination of how many people voluntarily threw themselves into this fence in order to preserve their dignity and free will, at least in death, which were denied them in the hell of Auschwitz. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:28, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Thi. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 06:31, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support It’s almost impossible to capture the horror of Auschwitz with a photo – in the light of the day that hell on earth looks so harmless and boring. Therefore the best we can do is to make the viewers discover themselves the cruelty which hides among the everday aspects of that place. At the first glance the photo looks trivial: we see just a fence. Second glance: it’s a fence with barbed wire. Third glance: the fence is not just fixed to the fence post, as usual, it is fixed with an electric fence insulators; so this was a electric barbed-wire fence. And if we now look at the background, over the innocent grass, we discover the silhouette of the building, dark and threatening. This menacing atmosphere is enforced by the gloomy day and the muted colours. IMHO the photo successfully captures the banality of evil which is one of the most horrifying aspects of the whole NS mass murder – and that is a real achievement. It would make a perfect cover photo for a book about the NS extermination machinery. – Aristeas (talk) 09:50, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Thi. -- Karelj (talk) 13:51, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support The picture has good symbolic power. --XRay 💬 18:34, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose If you don't read the description, it's just a normal photo, and it shouldn't be. JukoFF (talk) 19:01, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support The description is part and complements the process of understanding the file. ★ 23:42, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support because of the image's high educational value and strong symbolism. I agreed with Thi, but only until I read the description. Before today I was not aware of the horrible fact that there were electrified barbed fences at Nazi camps to prevent prisoners from escaping. Now I do, thanks to this image.--UnpetitproleX (Talk) 01:29, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Thi. -- Inu06 (talk) 03:34, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per JukoFF --Uoaei1 (talk) 05:56, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2024 at 17:51:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
- Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by Anitava Roy -- Anitava Roy (talk) 17:51, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Anitava Roy (talk) 17:51, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment a strange green noise under the mouth --Wilfredor (talk) 20:39, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment A very good picture, nice and sharp, but I agree with Wilfredor, that speckled pattern in the background under the mouth could do with some work. Also I had to fix the gallery again. Cmao20 (talk) 20:49, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2024 at 14:13:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Other#Germany
- Info The Ziegeleisee in the Ziegeleipark in Böckingen, Heilbronn, Germany, view from east in spring. Created on the site of a former brickyard, this pond has become home to so many plant and animal species that it has been declared a protected biotope. While I took some photos, a mute swan swept over the water and added a nice extra to the picture ;–). All by – Aristeas (talk) 14:13, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:13, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support As per comments on my talk page, superb composition and light, and I love the swan. Cmao20 (talk) 14:33, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao --Kritzolina (talk) 18:59, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 20:58, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:49, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support The beauty lies in the detail of the landing swan. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:14, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Inu06 (talk) 02:02, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 03:44, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- -donald- (talk) 05:54, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Pretty landscape with a nice detail in the center. Particularly appreciable at full size -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:30, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 13:58, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 18:36, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile, Radomianin and Cmao20. Superb light & details... --Terragio67 (talk) 18:53, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:03, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 23:42, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Salzburg Altstadt Panorama 20240728 P
Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2024 at 09:48:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page
-
Salzburg seen from Kapuzinerberg at golden hour
-
Salzburg seen from Kapuzinerberg at blue hour
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Austria
- Info Two identicals views at golden hour and blue hour from Kapuzinerberg to Hohensalzburg Fortress and the historic center of Salzburg, federal state of Salzburg, Austria. All by me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:48, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:48, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Two excellent captures of one of the most famous views of that famous old town. I am not 100% sure whether the set rules apply here or not; but I support either of the two images, whether together or each on its own. – Aristeas (talk) 10:23, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support Stunning work, and thank you for spending time doing all the annotations to show us what we're looking at. Cmao20 (talk) 10:26, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Supportǃǃ Two perfect panos, I'm astonished... – Terragio67 (talk) 12:29, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 13:18, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support for the set. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:10, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Exceptional resolution, nice viewpoint, special light in both -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:25, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support It's the return of the set nominations! ★ 23:43, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 07:56, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2024 at 09:39:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Chile#Antofagasta Region
- Info created by Silvio Rossi, uploaded by Tuvalkin, nominated by Yann
- Info The Lascar (left) and the Aguas Calientes (right) volcanoes, located in the Central Volcanic Zone of the Andes Mountains in Chile.
- Support I like the pastel colors, and the composition. Only one FP of nature of Chile. -- Yann (talk) 09:39, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Hem, luckily, about 30 FPs of nature in Chile (the link was broken). – Aristeas (talk) 09:57, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 10:12, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I like the composition a lot but I'm not sure about the image quality. There is not a lot of detail at full size - perhaps due to heat haze of some sort? I'm not quite convinced it's one of our best when we have Chilean landscapes like this but appreciate it's a slightly harsh vote Cmao20 (talk) 10:25, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 13:46, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2024 at 09:26:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
- Info created by Kabelleger - uploaded by Kabelleger - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1eetalk 09:26, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- —Bruce1eetalk 09:26, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:42, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 10:12, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great composition and light. Cmao20 (talk) 10:21, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Terragio67 (talk) 12:51, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 13:18, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 22:07, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 08:27, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20 – and once again a beautiful contrast between the muted colours of the landscape and the bright colours of the train. – Aristeas (talk) 09:25, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support Light, composition, fantastic landscape -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:21, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Here the sharpness is unfortunately not quite at the level we can usually expect from Bahnbilder.ch, sorry. --A.Savin 14:02, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Yeah, I know what you mean. I continue to support, but I do think an oppose is entirely reasonable in this case, Kabelleger has definitely presented sharper ones. Cmao20 (talk) 21:13, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support JukoFF (talk) 19:03, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 08:01, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree with Savin, author put shallow DoF and missed the target, suppose locomotive would be focus point but its in the middle. f/7.1 on 61mm. Not good setting for panorama shot. Composition is nice. --Mile (talk) 09:25, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2024 at 08:48:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1930-1939
- Info created by unknown photographer, restored and uploaded by Bammesk, nominated by Yann
- Info Three Nobel Prize laureates in physics photographed in 1931. In front row from left to right: Albert A. Michelson (1907 laureate), Albert Einstein (1921 laureate), Robert A. Millikan (1923 laureate). In back row from left to right: astronomer Walter Sydney Adams, mathematician Walther Mayer, historian Max Farrand.
- Support -- Yann (talk) 08:48, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 09:30, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:50, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good group photo, nice with the signatures, solid reproduction. – Aristeas (talk) 10:20, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great historical value and well restored Cmao20 (talk) 10:20, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Terragio67 (talk) 12:31, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per my support on the English WP FPC page. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:05, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Argenberg (talk) 12:16, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Agree with others -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:20, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 13:46, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 23:45, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Absolutely, very historical moment and restoration well done --Wilfredor (talk) 02:01, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2024 at 07:54:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Serbia
- Info St. Mark's Church, Belgrade, Serbia. My shot, drone. -- Mile (talk) 07:54, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 07:54, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Lovely church, nice composition and good quality Cmao20 (talk) 10:20, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 13:19, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Looks unreal — Inu06 (talk) 02:05, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Building, viewpoint, weather -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:17, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 13:46, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Very poor categorization --A.Savin 13:54, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Any suggestion ? Wanted to put Aerial shots, but probably would be only one so far. --Mile (talk) 09:16, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2024 at 21:49:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Other_land_vehicles
- Info created and uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:49, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:49, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 00:02, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:52, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support @UnpetitproleX: Thanks for the nomination. --Tagooty (talk) 13:49, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 14:47, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 15:12, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 08:33, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, not getting 'wow' from either the subject or composition. BigDom (talk) 15:31, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 23:45, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2024 at 21:23:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Algeria
- InfoDecoration of the upper facade of the minaret of the Mosque of Mansourah in Tlemcen, built during the siege of the city in 1303 by the Marinid dynasty. The minaret was one of the three tallest in the world at the time, standing at 45 meters, alongside the Giralda in Spain and the Koutoubia Mosque in Morocco, all inspired by the architecture of the minaret of Qal'at Bani Hammad. .Created by Riad Salih - uploaded by Riad Salih - nominated by Riad Salih -- (talk) 21:23, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 21:23, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support But the Qutb Minar is older and higher. ;o) Yann (talk) 21:34, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Minarets in the Maghreb (North Africa + Al Andalusia) are unique in the world, all in rectangular form and all inspired by the first mosque in the region, the Great Mosque of Kairouan. Riad Salih (talk) 09:24, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Might benefit from slight perspective correction to try to get all the verticals straight, however, this is a really cool motif and a great picture. Cmao20 (talk) 21:43, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- The minaret isn't perfectly symmetric due to the many restorations. Riad Salih (talk) 10:00, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:01, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful -- Inu06 (talk) 02:38, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Its leaning to left. Rotation nedeed, but i would not go distiortion correction or skewing, then upper part will be much wider than bottom and horizontal lines are sugesting to rotate - just rotation. --Mile (talk) 08:10, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Just want to second Mile’s hint. Is that minaret leaning in reality? If not, the photo would benefit from a small clockwise rotation. – Aristeas (talk) 10:18, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 13:46, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2024 at 20:59:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Japan
- Info Sunset view of the pond at Oizumi Ryokuchi Park. c|u|n by Laitche -- Laitche (talk) 20:59, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Laitche (talk) 20:59, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Good quality and a sensitive, subtle mood but I'm not sure I find this one extraordinary enough for FP. I'll live with it for a while. Cmao20 (talk) 21:44, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Certainly not as eye-catching as some other photos from the wonderful Japanese parks and gardens, but I love the serene mood and subtle beauty. Thanks to the perspective even the electricity pylon with its wires fits well into the composition, that’s quite an achievement. – Aristeas (talk) 13:37, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support The longer I look at it the more I 'get' the composition. Very nice. Cmao20 (talk) 03:10, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2024 at 16:48:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Papilionidae (Swallowtails)
- Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by Anitava Roy -- Anitava Roy (talk) 16:48, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Anitava Roy (talk) 16:48, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not sure about this one. Pretty butterfly, great composition and bokeh. Also huge resolution (104 megapixels) but perhaps too huge. The detail at full size isn't there and it makes me wonder if upscaling has taken place because the edges of the butterfly appear pixellated and the camera's native resolution is only 32.5 megapixels anyway (see EXIF data) so it seems like something's not right. Cmao20 (talk) 16:58, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Also I fixed the gallery + nominator but it'd be nice if you could fill that in yourself in future. Cmao20 (talk) 17:19, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- thanks Anitava Roy (talk) 17:49, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Also I fixed the gallery + nominator but it'd be nice if you could fill that in yourself in future. Cmao20 (talk) 17:19, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2024 at 14:55:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Hippopotamidae (Hippopotamuses)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:55, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:55, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Would be better still if he was facing towards rather than away from the camera, but regardless, excellent capture Cmao20 (talk) 16:55, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support As a viewer of this scene, I automatically look at the water, which is very well frozen at 1/2,000 of a second. In combination with the hippo, it conveys to me personally a fascinating moment worth supporting. -- Radomianin (talk) 23:08, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2024 at 13:39:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
- Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 13:39, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 13:39, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good composition and quality. Cmao20 (talk) 14:44, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 18:11, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 21:06, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:01, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:53, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Small overexposed area between body and wing and some colour fringing at the legs, but overall beautiful and very good quality. – Aristeas (talk) 10:15, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:35, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2024 at 10:51:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 10:51, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Info Here we have always an image of the town hall of Mont-de-Marsan as FP:
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 10:51, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very beautiful architectural photo Cmao20 (talk) 14:43, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Conditional s, but you must clean those "CA lines on border", anoted. --Mile (talk) 08:24, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice light and lighting (here modern, less yellowish floodlights are used). Agree that a careful check for CAs etc. would be welcome – e.g. at the left edge of the building and roof. – Aristeas (talk) 10:11, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I don't know how I can clean those "CA lines on border" better... Someone can help me? Tournasol7 (talk) 07:03, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support When viewing the photo at 100%, I found such insignificant CA on the left that they are not noticeable unless you specifically look for them. I don’t consider this a flaw. The photo is well done. -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 08:25, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 13:46, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2024 at 10:48:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Portugal
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 10:48, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 10:48, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Maybe a bit of a crop on the right would improve. Cmao20 (talk) 14:46, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose 1st WB is off, i would put yellow down, or try whole temp to put down. Then garbage bin in front and 2 light bean disturb. Quality is good. --Mile (talk) 08:04, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The yellow appearance of the façade is probably due to the floodlights used for the lighting (older floodlights often create a very warm tint); a comparison with the foreground and the sky shows that the white balance is not really off. So either we keep the whole appearance, saying that the lighting makes the façade that yellow, period (actually yellowish façades are common in blue hour shots); or only the yellow of the façade should be reduced, not the global temperature (the latter would make sky and foreground totally unrealistic). – Aristeas (talk) 10:09, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @Aristeas i tried here, global temp wont work, but problem is i dont know original color. Temp of lights really made worst. But i see down is OK temp and sky somehow. --Mile (talk) 10:47, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @Mile Wow, thank you very much, that’s a great attempt. Yes, the original colour is the question. But when comparing other photos in the category, I would say that your version seems very likely – when the Basilica looks more or less like this in daylight and like that at sunset, it should look more or less like in your version with enlightment at blue hour. – @Tournasol7: Would you like to upload Mile’s version (or something similar, if you prefer to do these edits yourself) under a new filename (because it’s clearly an edited version) and to offer it as an alternative version in this nomination? It would be interesting to see which version voters prefer. Of course it’s your photo and naturally it’s up to you how you want to proceed! – Aristeas (talk) 12:43, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Done; new version uploaded. Tournasol7 (talk) 07:09, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2024 at 10:12:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Computer-generated#Mathematics
- Info Square image with fractal elements full of circle shapes created by PantheraLeo1359531 - uploaded by PantheraLeo1359531 - nominated by PantheraLeo1359531 -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 10:12, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 10:12, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Interesting pattern, but I find the colors unpleasant. It seems there is color noise. Yann (talk) 10:24, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Info Ah yes, it turns to purple colors on pixel level. This is because the color comes from a color gradient, that cycles with every iteration (deeper into the fractal) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 10:43, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2024 at 04:41:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Automobiles
- Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 04:41, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 04:41, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I like the concept but the brush/masking marks on the right-hand side are very visible currently. I also find the metal object at the very bottom right a little distracting. BigDom (talk) 06:27, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- I have changed things. The background has improved in my opinion, even though I didn't find it annoying before. I also removed the visible part of the front headlight from the picture, but I didn't find this disturbing either. --XRay 💬 08:08, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you for that. The headlight at bottom right was merely personal taste; I would not oppose if you as the photographer prefer to keep it. The brush marks on the other hand were IMO a major issue and the photograph looks much improved in the latest version. Very happy to support now. BigDom (talk) 16:16, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:41, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice pars pro toto for the whole luxury car, espec. with the pretty reflection. – Aristeas (talk) 10:03, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Terragio67 (talk) 12:44, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 13:21, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support. --Gnosis (talk) 19:45, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 22:02, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2024 at 04:38:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Automobiles
- Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 04:38, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 04:38, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 08:01, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:08, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice composition. Cmao20 (talk) 14:40, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:02, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Terragio67 (talk) 12:46, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:55, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Interesting light -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:10, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Argenberg (talk) 12:15, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2024 at 01:34:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Laos
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:34, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:34, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent, and cool to get a photo with people praying. Cmao20 (talk) 02:41, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 04:32, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support very interesting shot -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 05:38, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support woah, that's a pretty amazing capture of people praying. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:26, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:09, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 08:01, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:08, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The monk in the middle looks like he has a loud noise in his back and neck, do you think you can improve this? --Wilfredor (talk) 14:48, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- It is a 1.3 s shot taken with a tripod, so possibly the people slightly moved during this relatively long time lapse. In my opinion it is still decent noise level, unless you pixel peep -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:09, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:45, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:45, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful and very educative. Basile, there is a small, but rough transition between smooth and noisy at the mat (?) – see image note. I do not mind the noise (it’s just natural in this dark place), but the fast transition bothers me a bit. Could you take a look and apply a little bit of local noise reduction there (and maybe at some similar small spots)? Thank you! – Aristeas (talk) 09:51, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Done Thank you -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:47, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you! Now it looks consistent. Best, – Aristeas (talk) 12:51, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Done Thank you -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:47, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Terragio67 (talk) 12:36, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support for the improved version. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:52, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 15:39, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Ermell (talk) 08:54, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Oct 2024 at 21:26:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Sky – Milky Way over the Marukha River valley, Arkhyz, Russiа
- Info created by Deodat Gautier - uploaded by Deodat Gautier - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 21:26, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- JukoFF (talk) 21:26, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support It could be a bit sharper but I like it. Cmao20 (talk) 01:21, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Mesmerizing -- Inu06 (talk) 03:43, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 05:39, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 07:21, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Question Could you please add EXIF data? Or at least some information (date, time, location, camera settings, etc.). --Yann (talk) 08:03, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Date: 03.05.2021
- Time: 01:10
- Location: Arkhyz, 43.622340, 41.444195
- Camera: Canon R6
- Lens: Sigma Art 28mm f/1.4
- Exposure: 19х16s (wo filter) + 19x16s (diffusion filter)
- ISO: 3200
- Dark, flat corrections.
- Software: Sequator 1.6.1, Adobe Photoshop Deodat Gautier (talk) 20:45, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great, thanks! Yann (talk) 21:41, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:02, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 18:12, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support The image makes me miss the times I've gazed upon the milky way camping in the Himalayas. Soon again, hopefully. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:43, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 21:50, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Fantastic to imagine we would see this if we had better eyes -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:56, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile. – I have taken the liberty to rename the file (and to update this nomination subpage) because the old name “Milky Way.jpg” was a bit too general to be useful. Hope it helps, – Aristeas (talk) 09:46, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:49, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Terragio67 (talk) 12:38, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:50, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 08:59, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Oct 2024 at 21:19:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals / Sea lion. JukoFF (talk) 21:19, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Info created by Елена Верещака - uploaded by Елена Верещака - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 21:19, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- JukoFF (talk) 21:19, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose A striking sight, but very noisy. I like it a lot but I'm no longer convinced it is amongst our best with the high standard of underwater photography we have seen from users such as Poco a poco recently. I'm also not sure whether it's a proper underwater photo or just an aquarium photo. Cmao20 (talk) 01:18, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- It doesn't look like an underwater shot, the head of the sea lion is above the water. An interesting view but the quality is pretty low. And yes, there is lack of information, there isn't even a single category Poco a poco (talk) 15:00, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose - Agree with Cmao20. Taken from above, not under water, but we need more information. We should be able to get the species -- there are only six of them, after all. There is one species in Russia -- Steller -- but I don't know how to tell the difference between it and e.g. California from this photo. The color/clarity of the water make me think it's an aquarium shot, but that could just be my ignorance. Regardless, it could use some denoising (though at 12,800 ISO, a lot of detail may be lost). Happy to support if these issues are fixed. — Rhododendrites talk | 14:46, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with your remarks, I was hasty with the nomination. Colleagues, please suggest a template for withdrawing a nomination. JukoFF (talk) 19:06, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- {{Withdraw}} works. It's a good photo -- would be worth nominating after some fixes. — Rhododendrites talk | 19:12, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Oct 2024 at 17:04:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Italy
- Info In 1691, Count Michelangelo Maffei, who had already had the salt warehouse built, had this powerful building built as a defense against pirate attacks. The main function of the Tower was that of defence, to signal attacks by bandits and raiders and to defend the precious resource of salt, kept in the adjacent warehouse. The Tower could also accommodate the guards who lived in it and made it an independent building, equipped with fireplaces, external water collectors, showers, drainage systems and other utilities. It is inspired by an ancient drawing by Michelangelo Buonarroti, created to defend the coastal areas of the Papal State and preserved in the archive of the Reverend Camera Apostolica. With a square plan with a side of 13 and a height of 23 metres, with walls 3 meters thick, the Tower was a real fort, with numerous openings, windows and loopholes equipped with short and long range armaments. Today it is owned by the municipality of Cervia and is home to the tourist office. Created - uploaded - nominated by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 17:04, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 17:04, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great. I'd appreciate it if you copied this cool info to the image description. Cmao20 (talk) 17:31, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Done. Thanks for your remark and support. Terragio67 (talk) 17:45, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 21:01, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 05:53, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:59, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Great detail as usual but the subject itself doesn't look extraordinary to me. It looks in fact almost so strongly renovated that it looks modern. Poco a poco (talk) 22:13, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, I compared this photo with a historical photo and there are no major differences apart from the window frames at the top. The tower was born to be also a palace-fortress of sighting and defense, it was very functional and nowadays it`s presented in a clean and linear way as it was in the past. Sometimes we find more fascinating towers that are ruined and abandoned, this photo is a sign of homage to the municipality of Cervia that maintains it impeccably. However, thank you for your judgment which, for the way you have formulated, for me, is still positive, thank you. Terragio67 (talk) 16:22, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Oct 2024 at 14:19:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Russia
- InfoThe Resurrection Monastery (Voskresensky Monastery) or New Jerusalem Monastery (Novoiyerusalimsky Monastery). Istra all by Елена Нечипоренко -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 14:19, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 14:19, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great quality, colours and composition, and I love the balloon. Cmao20 (talk) 14:22, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Delicate colors and contrast in a well-balanced composition. Terragio67 (talk) 17:22, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 20:57, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 21:00, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:47, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support Architecture, light and the colorful balloon adding poetry to the composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:39, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like the way the balloon echoes/inverts the cupolas. BigDom (talk) 06:35, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:59, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 19:08, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support The globe appears to be sharper than the trees that are closer, and there is also a distinct white border on the globe. Could you explain this? --Wilfredor (talk) 01:18, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Fortunately, I always keep the RAW files. I took many shots since there were people walking around. I've now uploaded a few of them to cloud storage so you can see that the hot air balloon wasn't added in Photoshop. https://disk.yandex.ru/d/250pA7j438AZuQ Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 04:45, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Baloon added some more vibrance. --Mile (talk) 08:18, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support word for word per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 09:33, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:44, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Cmao20, Basile and BigDom. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:37, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful and harmonious composition. ★ 10:05, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Oct 2024 at 23:08:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Printed#Posters_and_advertisements
- Info created by Savile Lumley - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:08, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:08, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Famous poster. FP for sure. Cmao20 (talk) 02:47, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 03:28, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support It even has its own article. Yann (talk) 18:32, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support What year is this? Wolverine XI 21:46, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Wolverine XI: March 1915 publication, a bit earlier for design. Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:16, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 06:35, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:59, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Terragio67 (talk) 12:39, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Oct 2024 at 16:25:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Austria
- Info View of the town of Werfen, Austria, taken from Hohenwerfen Castle which overlooks the town. I like the light, and how the river acts like a gentle leading line. Poco has a couple of FPs of the castle but there are none of the town. created by Poco a poco - uploaded by Poco a poco - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:25, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:25, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you for the nom! :) Poco a poco (talk) 17:38, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 18:37, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 22:22, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Fantastic panorama, viewpoint and weather -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:27, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Νικόλαος Κυριακάκης (talk) 10:06, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 14:07, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile --Terragio67 (talk) 17:25, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 21:00, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Inu06 (talk) 03:47, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 05:30, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 07:23, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:08, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Lovely view and nice light but the cut-off athletics track at the bottom is a bit distracting. BigDom (talk) 00:40, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Splendid view, great sky. – Aristeas (talk) 09:28, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 23:10, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Oct 2024 at 15:45:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural_elements#Doors
- Info Dar El-Beida, Fez, Marocco (الدار البيضاء, فاس). My shot. -- Mile (talk) 15:45, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Info Dar El-Beida = White House, and that is same name for Casablanca in Arabic.
- Support -- Mile (talk) 15:45, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Really like this. Great image quality, well framed, beautiful place and eye-catching walkers to add counterpoint. Cmao20 (talk) 15:48, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 16:41, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 18:38, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- good depiction of architectural designs Inu06 (talk) 3:46, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:23, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 17:27, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 21:00, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 05:54, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 07:23, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Really good compostion, the photographer really had a focus on how the composition should look like. --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 10:46, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:58, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent, per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 09:27, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 22:38, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 23:46, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Oct 2024 at 12:14:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#South Korea
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:14, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:14, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose A good shot of a nice temple, but the lack of symmetry (path vs first temple and first temple vs second temple) is a minus that is not compensated with extraordinary detail or light. Poco a poco (talk) 12:57, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Info Architects chose an asymmetrical architecture a few centuries ago, and I find the tree adapts nicely to its atypical environment in 2024 :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:16, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support I wonder if I'd prefer a shot taken a few paces forward, so that it focussed more on the temple entrance and a bit less on the surroundings. I find the perspective a tiny bit wide here (slight distortion on the tree). But this is a beautiful place and well photographed so I'd be happy to see it become FP. Cmao20 (talk) 13:28, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Totally agree, and I have this view on my computer. But there are things I like also in this large composition: the stone wall, the stone buried in the ground on the left, and above all the single tree, alone in the sky, that completely breaks the symmetry. Thank you very much for your review -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:28, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:58, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:58, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support for the combination of symmetry with asymmetry. – Aristeas (talk) 09:26, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Terragio67 (talk) 12:55, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 13:23, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Oct 2024 at 07:50:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures outdoors
- Info Sculptural group "The Taming of the Horse" by Peter Clodt, one of the four compositions on the Anichkov Bridge in St. Petersburg all by me -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 07:50, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 07:50, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good, compo as 1st. Some tight crop on left and maybe on top but quality and compo make it. --Mile (talk) 08:13, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support You found a nice angle. The light halo around the monument could be seen as a disturbance, but it must be considered that it also enhances the outline of the monument with the background of the sky creating an effect of prominence, I assume you wanted. I took the liberty of changing captions and category, double check, please. --Terragio67 (talk) 10:00, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Crop is too tight at the left and at the top, IMO. Interesting angle but the cut out feet are a bit disturbing as part of the composition. Perhaps because the framing is very short -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:56, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Ah, I see a new version has been uploaded yesterday. Which makes my comment obsolete and inaccurate. It's always better to warn participants about changes happening in the background, when their constructive criticism is relevant / taken into account, so that we can follow. But I also have the impression that the clouds are posterized. Not convinced enough by the exceptional nature of the photo cropped at the bottom, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:12, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree and not sure about what is extraordinary about this scultpure (as no information is provided). Poco a poco (talk) 12:56, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
-
weaksupport I do think the crop particularly on the left is a bit tight. The picture needs lead room there. Nevertheless it is a striking perspective from which to view this sculpture, and the image quality is very good. Cmao20 (talk) 13:25, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Full support now that the crop is improved, but in future, Елена Нечипоренко, it would be appreciated if you tag all voters (both support and oppose) when you make a major change to a picture during a nomination, so that they know they should re-evaluate their vote based on the new version. Cmao20 (talk) 13:52, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the remark, I'll take it into account. Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 14:12, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Full support now that the crop is improved, but in future, Елена Нечипоренко, it would be appreciated if you tag all voters (both support and oppose) when you make a major change to a picture during a nomination, so that they know they should re-evaluate their vote based on the new version. Cmao20 (talk) 13:52, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 21:00, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Oct 2024 at 11:27:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Sun
- Info created and uploaded by Donatas Dabravolskas - nominated by ★ -- ★ 11:27, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support The greatness of Rio de Janeiro is breathtaking. -- ★ 11:27, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 12:26, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:53, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support A bit noisy, but sure, it has the wow-factor. Cmao20 (talk) 13:23, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:57, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 14:07, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 14:22, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 14:54, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support More "Wow" than technical issues. --XRay 💬 16:43, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 18:40, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:38, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 21:00, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 05:32, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 07:23, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:08, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:56, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Breathtaking view, great mood. – Aristeas (talk) 09:22, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per XRay and Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:43, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2024 at 14:29:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#France
- Info created by Gzen92 - uploaded by Gzen92 - nominated by Gzen92 -- Gzen92 (talk) 14:29, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Gzen92 (talk) 14:29, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 22:02, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Satisfying composition but the image seems muted/underexposed to me; there are hardly any highlights/whites in the whole photo. I can see some halos around the trees and to the left of the tower also, so processing could be improved. Same composition on a day with more interesting weather/light (nice clouds or a colourful sunset, maybe) could be a winner. BigDom (talk) 10:10, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Alternate version (exposure)
- Support Adjusted exposure. Gzen92 (talk) 20:56, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 22:26, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2024 at 13:50:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Poland
- Info All by me -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:50, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:50, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Satisfying composition and good image quality in spite of slightly unsharp bottom right corner. Great drone photo. Cmao20 (talk) 14:21, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Problem here is i cant fix my eyes on something. I suppoose i should on building in bottom, but crop is bad, if castle is main, also crop is strange. I think you should cover more bottom or move camera back or tilt down. Quality is fine. --Mile (talk) 08:10, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree with Mile, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 12:50, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support This is a visually pleasing shot where the cityscape with its vibrant rooftops and the fortress on the hill blends well with the green landscape, creating a balanced and harmonious composition. -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 14:23, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:08, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco a poco. -- Karelj (talk) 14:30, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support The round shape of the streets around the hill has a subtle effect on the viewer. For me, the image composition works and personally gives me a wow effect. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:50, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2024 at 13:32:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Clothing and textiles
- Info All by me Jacek Halicki -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:32, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:32, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Fun facts: 1) I can say without a shadow of a doubt that 99% of Brazilians wear Havaianas flip-flops (I have a pair from the Simpsons line); 2) Havaianas means Hawaiians (in the feminine form). ★ 18:43, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, I've been going back and forth on this but I don't see it as great object photography. It's good quality and there's nothing wrong with it but IMO it's missing outstanding light. Cmao20 (talk) 13:54, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:55, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2024 at 08:59:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Czech Republic
- Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 08:59, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Pudelek (talk) 08:59, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good photo, I'd like to see the complete reflection but I understand that may not have possible in a single frame. Cmao20 (talk) 13:37, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:48, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support-- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:31, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:21, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I wouldn't call the architecture extraordinary, the reflection is cropped, resolution rather low for this kind of shot and it feels underexposed. Sorry, not a FP to me. Poco a poco (talk) 13:00, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Nice scene and I don't mind the cropped reflection (IMO it's better than awkwardly placing the horizon in the middle) but I agree with Poco that it is underexposed and rather small. Also, the description is lacking and neither it nor the categories tell us what building(s) we are looking at, only the name of the pond. BigDom (talk) 16:21, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Karelj (talk) 14:42, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 02:24, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Since there is a reflection, the crop is unfavorable. Really a bit dark and small. --Milseburg (talk) 13:03, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2024 at 03:09:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
- Info A visual of Maqam Ibrahim (Station of Abraham) in Great Mosque of Mecca, created by معتز توفيق اغبارية - uploaded by معتز توفيق اغبارية - nominated by Inu06 -- Inu06 (talk) 03:09, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Inu06 (talk) 03:09, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Saudi Arabia needs more attention. ★ 11:40, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support I agree, besides this photo is interesting and well done. Terragio67 (talk) 12:52, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support It is quite small and has visible blue chromatic aberrations, but the composition is good and I guess it will be hard to get better photos unless we have more Muslim Wikimedians. Cmao20 (talk) 13:31, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support per above it will be hard to get better photos unless we have more Muslim Wikimedians --RodRabelo7 (talk) 08:29, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support per above. ImamAnik (talk) 11:13, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:46, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:55, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Good compo, but nothing extrardinary to me and there are purple/blue fringes around the people contours. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 15:29, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- I respect your opinion but remember that the photo depicts a religious ritual in the Great Mosque of Mecca, the top site of Islam, something very noteworthy. ★ 16:57, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
weakOppose Interesting scene but nothing is particularly sharp, neither the people nor the structure; has CAs.'Weak' because of the point about limited access (ban on non-Muslims visiting).--UnpetitproleX (Talk) 18:53, 5 October 2024 (UTC)- The image is a much smaller crop of the bigger original. I guess the point about access doesn't really stand if a big (but not zoomed in) image of this already exists on commons. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:00, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Info CA is gone and sharp @Sebring12Hrs and UnpetitproleX: --Wilfredor (talk) 00:09, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support At least much better than the older photos of that holy place I know from books etc. … I like the wide variety of people of different ages, etc.; the photo seems to show that pilgrimage really unites the faithful independent from their origin, status, etc. – Aristeas (talk) 09:16, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
This alternative needs explicit approval of the nominator
|
---|
Edited from original300px|Maqam Ibrahim (Station of Abraham) in Grand Mosque of Mecca
|
Voting period ends on 12 Oct 2024 at 13:09:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements
- Info created by المصور أنس الحاج - uploaded by Mr. Ibrahem - nominated by Abo Yemen -- Abo Yemen✉ 13:09, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Abo Yemen✉ 13:09, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mr. Ibrahem (talk) 15:02, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Certainly an impressive sight but I'm unconvinced that the resolution is sufficient for FP in 2024, plus the vignetting in the top right corner disturbs me. Cmao20 (talk) 17:31, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- well the picture was taken 10 years ago. ill try to remove the vignette tho Abo Yemen✉ 18:44, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Cmao20 does this look good? Abo Yemen✉ 11:37, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Ermell Abo Yemen✉ 11:38, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- It's definitely better. I would give this version a mild support given irreproducibility value of a skyline in Yemen. Cmao20 (talk) 13:14, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- The vignette on the right-hand side is the most annoying Ermell (talk) 16:15, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Ermell i dont see any vignette on the right-hand side on the new version? Abo Yemen✉ 09:54, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- The picture is darker on the far right side and it looks as if it was taken through a window. Ermell (talk) 19:49, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Ermell i dont see any vignette on the right-hand side on the new version? Abo Yemen✉ 09:54, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Ermell Abo Yemen✉ 11:38, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Inu06 (talk) 02:39, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Pudelek (talk) 09:01, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Perspective correction required --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:31, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- may I know what is wrong with the perspective? Abo Yemen✉ 13:53, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Verticals should be straight Uoaei1 (talk) 09:57, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- may I know what is wrong with the perspective? Abo Yemen✉ 13:53, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yemen, rare to see. --Mile (talk) 09:58, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Yes, vignetting, but now it's a war zone; another photo like this one is almost improbable. ★ 14:21, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Cmao20 Ermell (talk) 05:45, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. Also too hazy in my eyes. --Milseburg (talk) 08:34, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not sure the white balance is correct. Was a filter used for this photo? The upper right corner looks weird and too dark. Interesting view but I agree with others the resolution is very limited for a panorama -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:35, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per abpve Poco a poco (talk) 12:44, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Perspective, sharpness, vignetting... --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 15:35, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Oct 2024 at 14:49:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport#Boats
- Info A visual of a Kashmiri lady on a Shikara (a wooden boat in Dal Lake) with houseboats in the background, created by Abid Sidiq Ahanger - uploaded by Abid Sidiq Ahanger - nominated by Inu06 -- Inu06 (talk) 14:49, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Inu06 (talk) 14:49, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 09:20, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good light and composition Cmao20 (talk) 17:17, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:02, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Pudelek (talk) 09:02, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:20, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I'm not convinced, sorry. The compo is boring (centered), the subject cannot be seen good, I'd rather see her face not her back and the lighting is not good and it's overall underexposed Poco a poco (talk) 13:19, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment For the diversity of opinions, I find the light attractive, but not the framing, cut too tight at the top. Unbalanced composition in my view, with the roofs missing. Nice colors but possibly underexposed image, yes -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:49, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Poco and Basile, sorry. As happy as it makes me to see a Srinagar nom, not FP worthy imo. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:06, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Unbalanced compo.Ermell (talk) 05:38, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 02:23, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Oct 2024 at 00:06:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1890-1899
- Info The entire Saxony-Coburg-Gotha family and further relatives at Coburg in 1894! From Queen Victoria to the Kaiser Wilhelm II and to the soon-to-become tsar Nicholas II, they are all there. A remarkable little piece of history. I searched for the photo among all with the highest resolution, taking off the yellowish atmosphere to make it even better. / Created by the photographer Eduard Uhlenhuth (1853-1919) - uploaded and nominated by LucaLindholm -- LucaLindholm (talk) 00:06, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- LucaLindholm (talk) 00:06, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support A cool bit of history indeed. Cmao20 (talk) 17:17, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Quality is average, but for the historic value, and the various people's mood. Yann (talk) 09:05, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:54, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 21:04, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 02:23, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kasir (talk) 14:52, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Oct 2024 at 20:30:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Science#Science
- Info created by Alexander von Humboldt - uploaded by Sette-quattro - nominated by Sette-quattro -- Sette-quattro (talk) 20:30, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Sette-quattro (talk) 20:30, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Interesting diagram, and high resolution, but we can have a better color balance and contrast: File:Alexander von Humboldt - Diagram of a cross-section of the earth's crust, edit.jpg, trying rolling back paper ageing. Yann (talk) 21:44, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Nice! Actually, I like the original scan, I feel it more 'natural' - or better, close to the source - given the age of the diagram. Sette-quattro (talk) 15:46, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Amazing historical scientific visualization of the Great Alexander von Humboldt from 1850. Ventolinmono (talk) 22:57, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support I quote @User:Yann for the alternative file, an excellent infographic. --LucaLindholm (talk) 13:10, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:48, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support, but there is a vertical line with some problems of resolution, form the letters: See_Thiere und Pflandez at the top, to GOTHA at the bottom. --Harlock81 (talk) 10:52, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Solid reproduction of one of Alexander von Humboldt’s famous diagrams which helped much to explain and popularized the connection between geology, geography, and biology. – Aristeas (talk) 08:54, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas. Cmao20 (talk) 14:04, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Oct 2024 at 10:55:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other
- Info Grand dieu du Sefar is the most famous cave painting in Sefar in Tassili n'Ajjer in ALgeria. In fact this cave painting is located in Algeria, Djanet in the park Tassili n'Ajjer in a precise place named Sefar. This is one of more than thousannds of cave paintin discovered by Henri Lhote and his team and they was guided by Djebrine Machar a Touareg guide who was known for a great expertise in the great Sahara's cave paintings.
- Abstain as author --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 10:08, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
All by me IssamBarhoumi -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 10:55, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Question Is it genuinely paler on the left hand side or is that a consequence of light conditions at the point when this photo was taken? Cmao20 (talk) 13:39, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- To answer your Question this is an other image tken of outside the cave so you can see all the painting from the left to the right which is limted by rocks.
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Grand_dieu_du_Sefar_02.jpg
- but for tis image Itried to focus on the most visible part to the left you can see only small symbols that are keeping to evolve and improve in paintig skills to the right. IssamBarhoumi (talk) 16:18, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think it's interesting enough to be FP. Cmao20 (talk) 23:39, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you IssamBarhoumi (talk) 09:13, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:53, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:19, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 02:24, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:54, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose It's underexposed, no information about the paintings/cave provided Poco a poco (talk) 08:28, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hello dear Poco: I added the details in the description and the info above. But there is no explanation of the meaning of the painting there is only interpretations such as women bowing to a God...
- For the exposure I will try to improve it for tomorrow IssamBarhoumi (talk) 07:49, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hello again dear Poco I improved the exposition. Have a look please. IssamBarhoumi (talk) 22:15, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Better now, and certainly a very interesting subject. – Aristeas (talk) 19:46, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Oct 2024 at 22:20:11
→
- Info In favor of the Adam Cuerden's levels adjusted version. (Original nomination)
- Delist and replace -- ★ 22:20, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:13, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace --Yann (talk) 09:48, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace ---SHB2000 (talk) 10:40, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace --Thi (talk) 12:00, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace Cmao20 (talk) 12:59, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:51, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace – Aristeas (talk) 09:22, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace .--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:52, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace as per the nomination. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:54, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace -- Terragio67 (talk) 07:40, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Oct 2024 at 20:00:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#North Caucasian Federal District
- Info Overview of the Upper Zagedan Valley with the mountain cirque formed by ancient glacial erosion and high-altitude lakes. Zagedan Ridge, Karachay-Cherkessia, Caucasus Mountains. All by -- Argenberg (talk) 20:00, 1 October 2024 (UTC).
- Support -- Argenberg (talk) 20:00, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:55, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:14, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 09:46, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support woah that's impressive. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:39, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 12:02, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 12:43, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent Cmao20 (talk) 12:57, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:26, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:07, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive view and striking composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:13, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Croped horizon. To me File:Zagedan Ridge, Zagedan Valley, Caucasus Mountains.jpg looks superior. --Milseburg (talk) 10:29, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- I was actually hesitant about which of these two versions to nominate and after a few minutes of contemplation finally decided to post this one because it felt more immersive and articulated for the cirque and the nearby lakes and rock formations. The other looks more conventional, more typical of how skylines are usually portrayed. But it could also be criticized in relation to this one, because while it has the horizon and distant peaks included, it also has the bottom near field view abruptly cropped out, shifting and dissipating the focus and exposure further away from the cirque into infinity. I don’t think either one of them is much better than the other. --Argenberg (talk) 13:50, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:46, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 14:40, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:09, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Picturesque landscape, stunning view. Like I Milseburg (see above), I may have preferred File:Zagedan Ridge, Zagedan Valley, Caucasus Mountains.jpg, but both are fine photos. – Aristeas (talk) 08:46, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Oct 2024 at 13:06:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Train stations
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by FBilula -- FBilula (talk) 13:06, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- FBilula (talk) 13:06, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose FP is "one of the best images on Commons". The image does not have anything that is out of the ordinary. As this bench seems to have some historic interest, you could nominate as a Valued Image. --Tagooty (talk) 15:04, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like the light, and the textures in the wood at full size. Quality is v good. And the caption makes it interesting because this is all that's left of the old station as a new station has been built around it. Not immediately stunning but FP on reflection, IMO. Cmao20 (talk) 18:09, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose as per Tagooty. Yann (talk) 10:31, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice light, appropriate use of DoF, good quality and interesting subject. I sat on one of these very benches myself in June this year. BigDom (talk) 03:18, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:47, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Tagooty Poco a poco (talk) 08:26, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)
Sat 05 Oct → Thu 10 Oct Sun 06 Oct → Fri 11 Oct Mon 07 Oct → Sat 12 Oct Tue 08 Oct → Sun 13 Oct Wed 09 Oct → Mon 14 Oct Thu 10 Oct → Tue 15 Oct
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)
Tue 01 Oct → Thu 10 Oct Wed 02 Oct → Fri 11 Oct Thu 03 Oct → Sat 12 Oct Fri 04 Oct → Sun 13 Oct Sat 05 Oct → Mon 14 Oct Sun 06 Oct → Tue 15 Oct Mon 07 Oct → Wed 16 Oct Tue 08 Oct → Thu 17 Oct Wed 09 Oct → Fri 18 Oct Thu 10 Oct → Sat 19 Oct
Closing a featured picture promotion request
The bot
Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.
Manual procedure
Any experienced user may close requests.
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg). See also {{FPC-results-reviewed}}.
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=("yes" or "no")|gallery=xxx (leave blank if "featured=no")|sig=~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
featured or not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Also add the picture to the appropriate gallery and section of Commons:Featured pictures, list. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images. An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.
- Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
- If it was an alternative image, use the subpage/com-nom parameter: For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}
- If the image is already featured on another wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the Assessments template. For instance {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- Add the picture to the chronological list of featured pictures. Put it in the gallery using this format: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other noms on that page for examples.
- You may simplify this if multiple things were done by the same user. E.g.: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created, uploaded, and nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the Talk Page of the nominator.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}ed, {{FPD}}ed and withdrawn nominations), open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you've just finished closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/October 2024), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
Closing a delisting request
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
'''Result:''' x delist, x keep, x neutral => /not/ delisted. ~~~~
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:Astrolabe-Persian-18C.jpg) - Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
delisted or not delisted
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] === becomes === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Move the actual template from Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list to the bottom of the actual month page on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/October 2024.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- Replace the template {{Featured picture}} on the image description page by {{Delisted picture}}. If using the {{Assessments}} template, change featured=1 to featured=2 (do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes).
- Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris).
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (d:Property:P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" from the picture's Structured data.
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in chronological list of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6) with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture in the gallery is not removed.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the above section. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Manual archiving of a withdrawn nomination
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
In the occasion that the FPCbot will not mark withdrawn nominations with a "to be reviewed" template and put them in Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review just like if they were on the usual list, put the following "no" template:
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=X|oppose=X|neutral=X|featured=no|gallery=|sig=--~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], not featured === - Save your edit.
- Open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/October 2024), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.